>-- Original Message --
>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 21:49:00 +0000
>From: -------@-------.co.uk
>Subject: you will never dare post this in a zillion years
>To: quinn@ambigious.org
>Cc: -------------@-----------.co.uk,
> --------------@-----------.ie,
> -----------@-----------.ie,
> -------------@-----------.ie
>
>
>to quinn norton (wife of danny o'brien - star reporter on the irish times
>and sunday times 'doors' section)
>
>copied to various media (proper media that is)
>
>copied to LA police
>
>ms norton
>
>your stuff about me on your web site about me stalking you is interesting
>although highly selective and totally incorrect.
>
>if only your dear gullible readers knew that i am not stalking you at all.
>
>you husband (danny o'brien) used the whole of one of his columns in the
>'sunday times' to carry out a vicious petty attack on me when i had not
>done a single thing to him
>
>your husband is also the registrant of -------.com which is a bad faith
>registration as he has this purely for malicious purposes against me.
>
>in short your expletive deleted of a husband is deliberately making my
life
>hell for malicious reasons of his own.
>
>something else you completely failed top mention on your web page attacking
>me for being a stalker
>
>i wanted to discuss all this with him - as you well know i did
>
>
>- odd you fail to mention any of this at all on your tacky website.
>
>i consider your postings libellous BTW, as would a court of law as you
know
>damn well that this is why i phoned you and not to 'satlk ' you as you
erroniously
>claim.
>
>i have no interest in you at all except for your bizarre sexual arrangements
>and the fact that your wimp of a husband is prepared to share you with
another
>TWO men one of whom you both live with.  honestly, what sort of man would
>put up with all that?
>
>YOU gave me your phone number when i did not even ask for it. i do not
have
>a phone number for your husband . therefore i phone you and ask to speak
>to him every single time i time i phone.
>
>as you well know.
>
>i am not cyberstalking you in the slightest and you know it
>
>to repeat, it was your husband's very hostile activities towards me which
>drove me to waste a lot of money phoning you so i could talk to him about
>my domain which he has hijacked and also the possibe libel case i am taking
>against him when i would much rather not speak at all to you two scumbags
>
>go on post this than (in its entirity ) if you dare
>
>conversely if you do NOT post this i will copy this to any of your readers
>who are taken in by your lies to show what a lying selective scumbag you
>really are.
>
>stalking allegations are extremely serious and should not be made lightly
>hence why a copy of this is going to LA police.
>
>BTW o'brien knows damn well who ----- --- ------ is as do i all too well
>now. she is the conceited friend of the conceited british traitor who just
>got 5 years 6 months less than most of the papers reckon he should have
>got for putting the lives of about 50 british agents at risk.
>
>i was not aware that i had given your permission to post my private emails
>to you all over the internet . although you have removed my name you habve
>left enough to enable anyone who knows o'brien and myself to identify me.
>
>
>still laws and rules only apply to mere mortals and not you two who think
>you are above the law.
>
>o'brien is bruinging the sunday times and the irish times into disrepute
>by his actions. i AM indeed writing this up - including now your rediculous
>stalking allegations. and if he wants to make  laughing stocks of the ST
>and IT then so be it
>
>
>
>without prejudice
>
>ian -------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>
>from quin norton's website:
>
>Polyamory ("many loves") is consensual, open, and honest non-monogamy.
This
>is not exactly everyone's definition, but it will get you by at con parties,
>where you will be considered more cool if you shorten it up to just "Poly".
>For me it means that I desire for myself an extended family of adults participating
>in loving but non-exclusive relationships.
>
>Am I a swinger? In a word, no. I am personally very focused on relationships.
>I've done the casual sex thing and it's not for me.
>Am I looking? No. Nope. Nada. Not Interested. I'm a poly without time for
>new relationships. Here's why....
>
>I live with two wonderful partners;
>
>Gilbert- a shorter readheaded uber unix former goth boy.
>Danny- taller, british, and not at all nasty.
>...And also seeing (though not as much as i'd like...):
>Mike- a lesbian separatist trapped in a man's body.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>